| 黄丽.图书馆虚拟数字人的应用风险、治理困境及责任机制[J].数字图书馆论坛,2024,20(9):64~71 |
| 图书馆虚拟数字人的应用风险、治理困境及责任机制 |
| Application Risks, Governance Dilemma, and Responsibility Mechanisms of Virtual Digital Human in Libraries |
| 投稿时间：2024-04-07 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2024.09.007 |
| 中文关键词: 虚拟数字人；生成式人工智能；科林格里奇困境；行动者网络；责任机制 |
| 英文关键词: Virtual Digital Human; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Collingridge’s Dilemma; Actor Network; Responsibility Mechanism |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 327 |
| 全文下载次数: 591 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 虚拟数字人技术是元宇宙图书馆落地应用的重要切入点，在为读者带来全新阅读体验的同时也伴随着算法偏见风险、数据安全风险和侵权责任风险，其风险治理面临前期风险难以预测、后期风险难以控制的科林格里奇困境。研究分析图书馆虚拟数字人存在的算法偏见风险、数据安全风险和侵权责任风险，指出技术优化型破解机制存在局限性，提出主体责任型破解机制存在可行性，并以算法偏见风险、数据安全风险、侵权责任风险为治理模块，将图书馆、开发者、读者、监管机构和图书馆虚拟数字人视为行动者，通过行动者网络理论建构图书馆虚拟数字人风险治理的主体责任机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Virtual digital human technology is an important entry point for the implementation and application of metaverse libraries. While providing readers with a brand-new reading experience, it is also accompanied by algorithmic bias risks, data security risks, and infringement liability risks. Its risk management faces the Collingridge’s Dilemma, where early risks are difficult to predict and later risks are difficult to control. This article analyzes thealgorithmic bias risks, data security risks, and infringement liability risks of virtual digital human technology in libraries, points out the limitations of technology optimized cracking mechanisms, and proposes the feasibility of subject responsibility based cracking mechanisms. With algorithm bias risks, data security risks, and infringement liability risks taking as governance modules, libraries, developers, readers, regulatory agencies, and library virtual digital human technology are regarded as actors, and the main responsibility mechanism for library virtual digital human risk governance is constructed through actor network theory. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
