| 姜恩波,潘婷,戴婷,杨明芬,高杨.FAIR原则评估指标与评估工具研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2023,(9):1~10 |
| FAIR原则评估指标与评估工具研究 |
| Research on FAIR Principles Assessment Indicators and Assessment Tools |
| 投稿时间：2023-07-20 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2023.09.001 |
| 中文关键词: FAIR原则；FAIR评估指标；FAIR评估工具 |
| 英文关键词: FAIR Principle; FAIR Assessment Indicator; FAIR Assessment Tool |
| 基金项目:本研究得到“国家遥感中心西藏分布数据平台建设”（编号：2021YFQ0043）资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 姜恩波 | 中国科学院成都文献情报中心；中国科学院大学信息资源管理系 | | 潘婷 | 上海师范大学图书馆 | | 戴婷 | 四川大学公共管理学院 | | 杨明芬 | 西藏自治区科技信息研究所 | | 高杨 | 西藏自治区科技信息研究所 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 982 |
| 全文下载次数: 1335 |
| 中文摘要: |
| FAIR原则自发布以来引发国际社会的广泛关注，一些机构和项目制定FAIR评估指标、开发FAIR评估工具。对这些评估指标和工具进行调研，揭示FAIR评估发展的现状，总结经验，以促进FAIR原则的发展。采用文献研究、网络调研的方法，介绍FAIR原则的发展背景，并针对研究数据联盟、FAIRsFAIR、欧洲开放科学云提出的FAIR评估指标体系进行对比和分析，此外还介绍目前国际上主要的评估工具类型、原理及评价维度。研究结果显示：相较于其他组织，欧盟更为积极主动地推动FAIR评估；当前主要的评估指标和评估工具存在认知差异，但对于FAIR的落地起到一定的积极作用；目前FAIR评估体系需提高标准化水平、与可信认证体系紧密结合、积极融入国际环境、结合社区的发展需求与特点开展互动，并与更多类型的科研成果管理模式结合。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The FAIR principles have attracted wide attention from the international community since its release. Some institutions and projects have developed FAIR assessment indicators and tools. The purpose of this paper is to investigate these assessment indicators and tools, to understand the current situation of FAIR principles assessment, to summarize experiences, and to promote the development of FAIR principles. This paper uses literature research and network research methods to introduce the background of the development of FAIR principles; introduces, compares, and analyzes the FAIR assessment index system proposed by Research Data Alliance, FAIRsFAIR, and European Open Science Cloud; introduces the main types, principles, and evaluation dimensions of the current international assessment tools. Compared with other organizations, the European Union is more proactive in promoting FAIR assessment. The current main assessment indicators and assessment tools have cognitive differences, but they play a positive role in the implementation of FAIR principles.The current FAIR assessment system needs to improve its standardization level, closely integrate with credible certification systems, actively integrate into the international environment, interact with the development needs and characteristics of the community, and integrate with more types of scientific research achievement management modes. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
