| 童刘奕,张鹏翼.《中国图书馆分类法》和《美国国会图书馆图书分类法》人工映射分析与差异性探究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018,(3):53~58 |
| 《中国图书馆分类法》和《美国国会图书馆图书分类法》人工映射分析与差异性探究 |
| Research on the Manual Mapping and Discrepancies of Chinese Library Classification and Library of Congress Classification |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 《中国图书馆分类法》;《美国国会图书馆图书分类法》;人工映射;映射关系类型 |
| 英文关键词: Chinese Library Classification;Library of Congress Classification;Artificial Mapping;Match Types |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2334 |
| 全文下载次数: 2332 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对知识组织系统进行映射,是解决不同知识组织系统之间互操作的方法之一.本研究以数学、心理学、教育领域为例,对《中国图书馆分类法》和《美国国会图书馆图书分类法》相关领域类目进行映射,探讨映射过程中体现的两部分类法的差异性、映射难点和相应的解决办法.在映射过程中,采用"就上不就下,就近不就远"的原则,建立等同、包含于、包含和相关4种映射关系.4种关系各包含类目196条(占24.5%)、423条(占52.9%)、50条(占6.3%)、130条(占16.3%).影响映射关系类型的主要原因有语言文化差异、社会背景差异、编制原则不同、国内外学科发展水平不同. |
| 英文摘要: |
| Mapping knowledge organization system is one of the methods to solve the interoperation between different knowledge organization systems. In this paper,we mapping Chinese Library Classification and Library of Congress Classification in the fields of mathematics,psychology and education,and explore the differences between the two classifications,discuss the difficulty of mapping,and explore the solution.During mapping Chinese Library Classification and Library of Congress Classification,the principle is"narrow-match first,more relevant term first".And there are four match types:exact-match,narrow-match,broad-match and relevant-match. Each of the four relationships contains 196 items (24.5%), 423 items (52.9%), 50 items (6.3%) and 130 items (16.3%). The main factors that influenced the match type are: different cultural and language background, different social backgrounds, different principles when compiling the classifications, the gap of subject development in America and China. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
