| 余慧,马梧桐,张藤予,纪颖茹.商业出版社与非营利出版社开放出版现状对比研究与启示[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025,21(12):59~68 |
| 商业出版社与非营利出版社开放出版现状对比研究与启示 |
| Comparative Study of Open Publishing Between Commercial and Non-Profit Publishers and Implications |
| 投稿时间：2025-11-09 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2025.12.007 |
| 中文关键词: 开放获取；开放出版；商业出版社；非营利出版社 |
| 英文关键词: Open Access; Open Publishing; Commercial Publisher; Non-Profit Publisher |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 余慧 | 中国科学技术信息研究所 | | 马梧桐 | 中国科学技术信息研究所 | | 张藤予 | 中国科学技术信息研究所 | | 纪颖茹 | 中国科学技术信息研究所 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4 |
| 全文下载次数: 4 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在开放获取（Open Access，OA）浪潮之下，对比研究商业出版社与非营利出版社在开放出版生态中的差异化定位与现实路径，对于促进我国构建OA体系具有重要参考价值。本研究选取施普林格·自然（Springer Nature）、威立（Wiley）、爱思唯尔（Elsevier）、泰勒·弗朗西斯（Taylor & Francis）4家商业出版社及美国科学公共图书馆（Public Library of Science，PLOS）、美国计算机协会（Association for Computing Machinery，ACM）、电气电子工程师学会（Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers，IEEE）3家非营利出版社作为研究对象，采用网络调研与内容分析方法，将开放出版研究聚焦在出版内容、实现机制、OA协议三大核心层面，基于对两类出版社开放出版现状的多维度剖析，从开放转换速度、对文章处理费（Article Processing Charge，APC）模式的态度、OA运动的角色定位等角度进行对比分析，揭示OA生态中不同主体的行为逻辑与价值导向。在此基础上，为我国开放出版带来三点启示：推动科技期刊集群化与联盟化，提升转型敏捷性；探索多元开放出版模式，降低对APC的依赖；加强顶层设计，构建非营利开放出版核心力量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Against the backdrop of the open access movement, a comparative study on the differentiated positioning and practical pathways of commercial publishers and non-profit publishers in the open publishing ecosystem is of great reference value for advancing the construction of China’s open access system.This paper takes four commercial publishers (Springer Nature, Wiley, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis) and three major non-profit publishers (PLOS, ACM, IEEE) as research objects. Using web-based research and content analysis, it focuses the study of open publishing on three core dimensions: publishing content,implementation mechanisms, and open access agreements. Based on a multi-dimensional analysis of the current state of open publishing for both types of publishers, this paper conducts a comparative investigation into their differences in open transition speed, attitudes toward the article processing charge (APC) model, and role positioning in the open access movement, so as to reveal the behavioral logic and value rientation of different actors in the open access ecosystem. On this basis, three implications are proposed for China’s open publishing practice: promoting the clustering and alliance development of scientific and technical journals to enhance transition agility; exploring diversified open publishing models to reduce dependence on APC; and strengthening top-level design to build a core force for non-profit open publishing. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
