| 周朝阳,贺艳菊.融合三角引用结构特征的论文颠覆性指数优化研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025,21(12):38~47 |
| 融合三角引用结构特征的论文颠覆性指数优化研究 |
| Improvement on Disruption Index of Papers Integrating Triangular Citation Structure Characteristics |
| 投稿时间：2025-11-21 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2025.12.005 |
| 中文关键词: 颠覆性指数；三角引用；创新性评价；耦合关系；共引关系 |
| 英文关键词: Disruption Index; Triangular Citation; Innovation Evaluation; Coupling Relationship; Co-Citation Relationship |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 周朝阳 | 湖北大学图书馆；湖北大学历史文化学院 | | 贺艳菊 | 湖北大学图书馆 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3 |
| 全文下载次数: 2 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 颠覆性指数是测度论文创新性的新兴指标之一。基于文献引用结构的传统颠覆性指数计算方法仅考虑直接引用特征，无法充分反映学术创新过程中完整的文献引用及知识传递过程。融合三角引用结构特征的论文颠覆性指数有助于更全面、准确地测度论文间的引用强度，提升学术论文创新性评价的科学性与准确性。在挖掘文献三角引用关系的基础上，本研究构建了加权颠覆性指数计算方法。首先，依据文献耦合特征对同时引用焦点文献及其参考文献的文献进行加权，利用共引特征对引用焦点文献但未引用其参考文献的文献进行加权；其次，基于加权特征量优化原有颠覆性指数计算框架；最后，以1995—2015年诺贝尔物理学奖得主在美国物理学会系列期刊上发表的论文为样本进行实证研究。结果显示，本研究提出的方法能够提升论文颠覆性指数的准确性和有效性，为学术创新性评价提供支持。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The disruption index is one of the latest indicators to measure the innovativeness of papers. The traditional calculation method based on the citation structure of literature only considers direct citation features, which cannot fully reflect the complete literature citation and knowledge transfer process in the academic innovation process. The disruption index integrating the characteristics of triangular citation structure helps to more comprehensively and accurately measure the citation intensity between papers, enhancing the scientificity and accuracy of the evaluation of academic paper innovativeness. Based on exploring the triangular citation relationships in literature, this study constructs a weighted disruption index calculation method. Firstly, based on the coupling characteristics, the literature that simultaneously cites the focal literature and its referenced literature is weighted. Using the co-citation characteristics, the literature that cites the focal literature but not its referenced literature is weighted. Then, the original disruption index calculation framework is optimized based on the weighted characteristic values. Finally, an empirical study is conducted using papers published by Nobel Prize winners in Physics in journals of American Physical Society from 1995 to 2015 as samples. Empirical results show that the method proposed in this study can enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of the disruption index, providing support for academic innovation evaluation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
