| 邓社民,郝嫚利.基于“主体-工具-主题-效力”四维框架的数据知识产权登记政策量化研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025,21(8):56~65 |
| 基于“主体-工具-主题-效力”四维框架的数据知识产权登记政策量化研究 |
| Quantitative Research on Data Intellectual Property Rights Registration Policy Based on Four-Dimensional Framework of “Subject-Tool-Theme-Effectiveness” |
| 投稿时间：2025-07-23 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2025.08.006 |
| 中文关键词: 数据知识产权；登记政策；政策量化；PMC指数模型；LDA模型；政策工具 |
| 英文关键词: Data Intellectual Property Right; Registration Policy; Policy Quantification; PMC Index Model; LDA Model; Policy Tool |
| 基金项目:本研究得到国家社会科学基金重大项目“铸牢中华民族共同体意识法制保障研究”（编号：21VMZ010）、中国版权保护中心2024年度版权研究重点项目“场景驱动创新范式下AIGC对版权制度的挑战与因应”（编号：BQ2024007）资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 邓社民 | 武汉大学法学院 | | 郝嫚利 | 武汉大学法学院 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 23 |
| 全文下载次数: 44 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 深入分析当前数据知识产权登记政策内容，为未来政策完善提供参考建议。以政策制定和执行为基本逻辑依据，构建“主体-工具-主题-效力”的协同分析框架，按照指定检索式收集到29份政策，借用NVivo20软件、LDA模型和PMC指数模型等工具分析政策主体、政策工具、政策主题和政策效力。分析发现，现有数据知识产权登记政策存在登记机构不统一、政策工具不平衡、政策目标不完整和政策柔性机制不健全四大问题。据此，提出如下建议：建立全国数据知识产权登记平台，限制任意授权；提升数据知识产权登记质量，平衡政策工具；中央评估结合地方探索，扩大登记证书事实效力；降低数据知识产权登记政策刚性，协调运行机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the current content of the data intellectual property registration policy to provide reference suggestions for future policy improvement. Based on the basic logical basis of policy formulation and implementation, a collaborative analysis framework of "subject-tool-theme-effectiveness" is constructed. According to the specified search formula, 29 policies are collected. Tools such as Nvivo 20 software, LDA model, and PMC index model are used to analyze the policy subject, policy tool, policy theme, and policy effectiveness. Analysis reveals that the current data intellectual property registration policies have four major problems: inconsistent registration institutions, unbalanced policy tools, incomplete policy goals, and imperfect policy flexibility mechanism. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward: establishing a national data intellectual property registration platform to restrict arbitrary authorization; improving the quality of data intellectual property rights registration and coordinating and balancing policy tools; combining central assessment with local exploration to expand the factual validity of registration certificates; and reducing the rigidity of policies for data intellectual property rights registration and coordinating the operation mechanism. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
