| 马小琪,赵梓羽.学术图书开放获取利益相关主体间冲突模拟与化解策略研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025,21(3):10~21 |
| 学术图书开放获取利益相关主体间冲突模拟与化解策略研究 |
| Conflict Simulation and Resolution Strategies Among Stakeholders of Open Access to Academic Books |
| 投稿时间：2024-11-25 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2025.03.002 |
| 中文关键词: 开放获取图书；利益主体；冲突分析图模型；稳定性分析；敏感性分析 |
| 英文关键词: Open Access Book; Stakeholder; Graph Model for Conflict Resolution; Stability Analysis; Sensitivity Analysis |
| 基金项目:本研究得到国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于‘结构-行为-绩效’范式的图书开放获取协作商业模式研究”（编号：24BTQ006）资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 马小琪 | 黑龙江大学信息管理学院；黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心 | | 赵梓羽 | 黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 99 |
| 全文下载次数: 60 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 图书开放获取各利益相关主体间存在的利益偏好与冲突，导致学术图书的开放获取进程趋缓。对学术图书开放获取各利益相关主体的策略选择及均衡策略组合进行分析，有助于找寻破解冲突、促进主体间合作共赢的途径，推进学术图书向开放获取的逐渐转换。运用冲突分析图模型构建学术图书开放获取核心利益相关主体的冲突模型，进行稳定性分析和稳定后分析。研究发现，实现均衡解的理想路径为：作者选择钻石开放获取，出版社选择适度开放，文献组织选择参与开放获取，资助机构对出版社进行资金支持，用户支持开放获取。进一步的敏感性分析显示，均衡解的结果对出版社的偏好信息较为敏感，表明出版社的策略选择对破解冲突有着至关重要的作用。为找寻相互合作共赢的路径，基于图书开放获取业务流程，以群体理性的合作均衡解为目标导向提出协作建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Preferences and conflicts of interest among various stakeholders in open access to books have slowed down the process of full conversion of academic books to open access. Analyzing the strategy choices and balanced strategy combinations of various subjects with interests in open access to academic books can help find strategy choices to break conflicts, promote inter-subject cooperation and win-win situation, and promote the gradual conversion of academic books to open access. In this paper, we use the graph model for conflict resolution to construct a conflict model of the core stakeholders of open access to academic books, and conduct stability analysis and post-stabilization analysis. The study finds that the ideal path to achieve the equilibrium solution is for authors to choose diamond open access, publishers to choose moderate openness, documentation organizations to choose to participate in open access, funding agencies to financially support publishers, and users to support open access. Further sensiivity analysis shows that the outcome of the equilibrium solution is more sensitive to the publisher’s preference information, suggesting that the publisher’s strategic choice plays a crucial role in resolving the conflicts. In order to find the path of mutual cooperation and win-win situation, this paper puts forward the collaboration proposal based on the open access business process, taking the cooperative equilibrium solution of group rationality as the goal orientation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
