| 李成熙,吴新年.美欧日数据治理政策及实践的比较分析与启示[J].数字图书馆论坛,2024,20(7):11~18 |
| 美欧日数据治理政策及实践的比较分析与启示 |
| Comparative Analysis and Insights of Data Governance Policies and Practices in the United States, European Union, and Japan |
| 投稿时间：2024-04-25 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2024.07.002 |
| 中文关键词: 全球治理；数据治理；数据主权；数据立法；数据政策 |
| 英文关键词: Global Governance; Data Governance; Data Sovereignty; Data Legislation; Data Policy |
| 基金项目:本研究得到国家社会科学基金项目“演化视角下新兴技术形成机制与识别方法研究”（编号：20BTQ094）资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 李成熙 | 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院； 甘肃省知识计算与决策智能重点实验室；中国科学院大学经济与管理学院 | | 吴新年 | 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院； 甘肃省知识计算与决策智能重点实验室；中国科学院大学经济与管理学院 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 696 |
| 全文下载次数: 1340 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 数据主权是国家主权在网络空间中的重要体现，加强全球数据治理成为当下国际战略共识。研究发达国家的数据治理政策及实践经验，对我国当前数据治理体系与能力建设具有重要借鉴意义。通过文献调研、网络调研等方式对美欧日代表性数据治理政策及实践进行梳理，采用“内容—价值—实践”的分析框架厘清美欧日数据治理政策核心内容、价值导向和实践路径的异同点。研究发现，美欧日数据治理政策的核心内容和价值导向存在相似性，但数据治理实践存在基于地区情况的差异。结合我国国情和数据治理发展需求，建议从完善数据治理体制和配套法规建设、抢抓数据治理话语权与规则制定权、重视加强数据治理领域的国际合作和推动数据要素利用及价值实现4个方面入手，不断提升数据立法域外效力、数据治理国际竞争力，并推动构建开放共赢的数据治理新格局。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Data sovereignty is an important embodiment of national sovereignty in cyberspace, and strengthening global data governance has become the current international strategic consensus. The research on the data governance policies and practical experience of developed countries has important reference significance for the current data governance system and capacity building in China. Through literature research and network research, representative data governance policies and practices in the United States, European Union, and Japan are sorted out, and the analysis framework of “content-value-practice”is adopted to clarify the differences and similarities between the core content, value orientation, and practice paths of data governance policies in the United States, European Union, and Japan. The research finds that there are similarities in the core content and value orientation of data governance policies in the United States, European Union, and Japan, but there are differences in data governance practices based on regional conditions. Combined with China’s national conditions and the development needs of data governance, it is proposed to start from four aspects: improving the data governance system and supporting regulations, seizing the right to speak and make rules in data governance, emphasizing the strengthening of international cooperation in data governance, and promoting the utilization and value realization of data elements. The above measures will enhance the extraterritorial effectiveness of data legislation, the international competitiveness of data governance, and promote the practice of building a new pattern of open and win-win data governance. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
