| 耿瑞利,武川川,臧国全,徐梦婷.结构特征与政策工具双重视角下我国个人隐私保护法律法规体系探析[J].数字图书馆论坛,2024,20(1):39~49 |
| 结构特征与政策工具双重视角下我国个人隐私保护法律法规体系探析 |
| Analysis of China’s Privacy Protection Law and Regulation System from Dual Perspectives of Structural Characteristics and Policy Tools |
| 投稿时间：2023-10-13 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2024.01.005 |
| 中文关键词: 隐私保护；法律法规；结构特征；政策工具 |
| 英文关键词: Privacy Protection; Law and Regulation; Structural Characteristic; Policy Tool |
| 基金项目:本研究得到郑州大学人文社会科学优秀青年科研团队资助项目“政府开放数据隐私风险治理效能评估研究”（编号：2023-QNTD-07）、
国家社会科学基金重大项目“政府数据的隐私风险计量与保护机制创新研究”（编号：21&ZD338）资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 耿瑞利 | 郑州大学信息管理学院；郑州市数据科学研究中心 | | 武川川 | 郑州大学信息管理学院 | | 臧国全 | 郑州大学信息管理学院；郑州市数据科学研究中心 | | 徐梦婷 | 西安电子科技大学计算机科学与技术学院 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 424 |
| 全文下载次数: 628 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 个人隐私保护法律法规体系是维护个人隐私权、防范隐私泄露的有力工具，从结构特征与政策工具双重视角对其分析探索，可窥探逻辑结构内涵、价值作用路径以及存在问题等。首先，采集我国有关个人隐私保护的法律法规共计72份，运用内容分析法对651条相关文本条款进行编码和解读，从发文时间、发文主体、参与主体和保护手段等维度分析其结构特征。其次，从环境型、需求型和供给型3个维度评析政策工具的作用价值。最后，基于双重视角进行交叉分析。研究发现，目前我国个人隐私保护法律法规体系的逻辑结构呈现发文主体协作性强且领域融合、政策参与主体多元化等特征，其价值作用路径体现出对政策使用具有侧重性、以发挥环境型政策的间接作用为主等特点，但也存在政策工具结构失衡、互补作用弱、公众参与渠道受限等问题。依据调研结果提出相关对策建议，为我国个人隐私保护法律法规体系的完善提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The individual privacy protection law and regulation system is a powerful tool for protecting personal privacy rights and preventing privacy disclosure. By analyzing and exploring it from the perspectives of structural characteristics and policy tools, this paper revealed the logical structure, value pathways, and existing problems. A total of 72 laws and regulations related to privacy protection in China were collected, and 651 relevant clauses were coded and interpreted using the content analysis method. The structural characteristics were analyzed from the dimensions of issuing time, subject, participant, and means of protection. Policy tool values were evaluated from three dimensions: environment, demand, and supply. Finally, a cross-analysis was conducted based on dual perspectives. This paper found that the logical structure of China’s privacy protection law and regulation system was characterized by strong collaboration among issuing subjects, domain integration, and diversification of participants. The value pathway was characterized by a focus on policy use and the indirect role of environmental policies. But there were also problems such as imbalanced policy tool structure, weak complementary effects, and limited channels for public participation. Countermeasures and suggestions were proposed to provide references for the improvement of the law and regulation system. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
