| 肖妍.国际上同行评议典型做法及对我国的启示[J].数字图书馆论坛,2022,(1):68~72 |
| 国际上同行评议典型做法及对我国的启示 |
| Typical Practices of Peer Review in the World and Its Enlightenment to China |
| 投稿时间：2021-12-20 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2022.01.009 |
| 中文关键词: 同行评议；科技评价；典型做法 |
| 英文关键词: Peer Review; Science and Technology Evaluation; Typical Practice |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1678 |
| 全文下载次数: 4225 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议一直是最权威、最有效的科学评价方式，美国、日本、欧盟等发达国家和国际组织都建立较为完整的同行评议制度，制定同行评议政策法规，建立标准化的评议流程，针对不同类型的项目采取不同评议方法。面对科技创新高质量发展的新要求、新任务，本文从加强相关法规体系建设、建立规范化的同行评议准则、构建完善的同行评议专家库、探索因项制宜的同行评议方式、大力营造良好的同行评议生态环境等方面对规范和完善我国同行评议制度提出对策建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review has always been the most authoritative and effective scientific evaluation method. Developed countries and international organizations such as the United States, Japan and the European Union have established a relatively complete peer review system, formulated peer review policies and regulations, established standardized review processes, and adopted different review methods for different types of projects. Facing the new requirements and tasks of high-quality development of scientific and technological innovation, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to standardize and improve China’s peer review system from the aspects of strengthening the construction of relevant legal system, establishing standardized peer review criteria, building a perfect peer review expert database, exploring peer review methods adapted to different conditions, and vigorously creating a good peer review ecological environment. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
