| 邓荔萍.科学评价体系中同行评议与文献计量的实证分析[J].数字图书馆论坛,2014,(6):43~47 |
| 科学评价体系中同行评议与文献计量的实证分析 |
| Empirical Study on the Association between Expert Review and Bibliometrics in Research Assessment |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科学评价;同行评议;文献计量 |
| 英文关键词: Research performance assessment;Peer review;Bibliometrics |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2009 |
| 全文下载次数: 1600 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过对比F1000因子与被引频次、F1000因子与期刊评价指标，并对主要指标进行相关性分析，来验证同行评议与引文分析间的相关性。结果表明，F1000因子与被引频次呈正相关性，即专家打分与被引频次变动方向相同；但也存在专家打分高的论文被引频次低，而专家打分低的论文被引频次高的事实。相关性分析的结果表明：在特征因子、SNIP等主要指标中，SJR、IF与专家评议值相关度最大。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to verify the association between expert assessment and bibliometric indicators, this paper compares the F1000 factor with cited times of articles. The result shows that there is a significant positive correlation between expert assessment of importance and impact as measured by number of citations overal . However, analysis indicates that there are some exceptions that some papers highly rated by experts were not highly cited, and vice versa. Meanwhile, the correlations analysis shows that the SJR and IF factor are more relevant with peer review. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
